The dynamics of state conflict in the era of globalization reflects the complexity of interactions between states and non-state actors in an ever-changing political, economic and social context. The process of globalization has created closer networks between countries, but has also fueled competition for resources, cultural identity and national security. First, it is important to understand that globalization is changing the way countries interact with each other. An increasingly interconnected world order has positive impacts, but also raises tensions. Developing countries are often caught in economic and political competition with developed countries, creating the potential for conflict. For example, tensions between countries in Southeast Asia and major powers such as the United States regarding maritime interests is one example. Second, issues of identity and culture also trigger conflict. In an era where cross-border migration and communication has become easier, shifting identities often cause friction. Minority groups may feel alienated in wider society, giving rise to dissatisfaction and the potential for horizontal conflict. An example is the tension between ethnic groups in the Middle East region and state powers that seek to maintain the status quo. Furthermore, non-traditional threats, such as terrorism and drug trafficking, also change the dynamics of conflict. These transnational networks often involve non-state actors that are difficult for states to control. Countries must form international partnerships to combat this threat; a real example is the collaboration of countries in Europe to deal with the challenges faced by extremist groups. Additionally, climate change is increasingly becoming a driver of conflict. Uncertainty in natural resources due to climate change, such as drought and natural disasters, can trigger disputes between countries. Countries that depend on water resources, for example, could potentially experience strain when those resources become scarce. In the context of globalization, social media also plays an important role in triggering conflict. These platforms enable the spread of information and propaganda that can fuel social tensions. Social movements that rely on digital media can stimulate mass mobilization, but also have the potential to create higher polarity among society. From an economic perspective, the unfair distribution of wealth is a source of tension. Globalization often benefits certain groups, while leaving others behind. This inequality can create protests and riots that increase tensions between society and the government. Finally, the role of international organizations such as the UN and ASEAN in mitigating conflict is very important. Through diplomacy and mediation, they tried to create a peaceful solution. However, the effectiveness of these institutions is often limited by the political interests of their member states. Overall, state conflict in the era of globalization is a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving diverse actors and factors. Understanding these dynamics helps to anticipate and find solutions to emerging challenges in the future.